Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01278
Original file (BC 2013 01278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01278
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical 
Procurement Standards” and reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily 
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation 
without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to 
reenter military service.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 19 Dec 13, the Board considered and denied applicant’s original 
request to have his RE code changed to allow him to re-enter 
military service.  He contended he had no shoulder pain or laxity 
prior to entering the military and was told he could apply to re-
enter the military after his condition was stable.  The Board 
noted the evidence was not sufficient to warrant changing the 
applicant’s RE code to allow him immediate reenlistment for 
military service.  The Board further noted that while it may 
appear the applicant may meet the current medical accession 
standards, it would be more appropriate for him to apply for an 
enlistment waiver, rather than changing his RE code to allow him 
to re-enter military service.  For an accounting of the facts and 
circumstances surrounding his original request and the rationale 
for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of 
Proceedings, with exhibits, at Exhibit F.  

By letter dated 13 Feb 14, the applicant requests reconsideration 
of his request to change his narrative reason for separation and 
RE code to allow him to reenter military service.  The applicant 
states he does not have generalized laxity of the shoulders.  His 
enlistment was based on an extensive physical examination by staff 
at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS).  He was not 
trying to hide any instability with his shoulders when he marked 
“No” for Block 12a on the DD Form 2807-1, Report of Medical 
History.  The only documented incident related to a joint was an 
almost broken arm at the age of five.  There is a distinction 
between an actual or complete dislocation and a subluxation.  A 
subluxation is an incomplete dislocation, which is common in 
children between the ages of six months and seven years old.  At 
the age of five, he received a diagnosis of subluxed elbow and not 
a dislocation.  He adequately performed most activities and 
exercises while in basic military training (BMT) until he 
dislocated his right shoulder.  He waived his rights during the 
discharge process due to the unsubstantiated charge of an 
Erroneous Enlistment, warnings of fines, adverse adjudication, and 
offer of legal counsel.  The medical staff told him could reenlist 
and resume BMT after being examined and cleared by a local 
physician.  Prior to enlisting in the military, he participated in 
numerous physical activities, which included high school sports 
teams and recreational sports leagues, which disprove any 
limitations due to laxity.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the 
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of the 
evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we 
believe a preponderance of the evidence supports some measure of 
relief.  While we do not find the evidence presented by the 
applicant sufficient to conclude that his RE code of 2C and 
narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical 
Procurement Standards” were somehow erroneous or did not 
accurately reflect the circumstances of his separation, we believe 
it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records so 
that he had an opportunity to be considered for enlistment, with a 
waiver.  In this respect, we note the applicant has provided 
medical documentation from his attending physician indicating 
that, in his opinion, the condition for which he was separated has 
been resolved.  While we find the documentation noteworthy, it is 
not sufficient for us to conclude that his records should be 
corrected to make him eligible for immediate enlistment as such 
determinations are best made at a Military Entrance Processing 
Station (MEPS).  Therefore, while the applicant would like us to 
recommend that his records be corrected to reflect he is 
immediately eligible for reenlistment, we believe it is proper and 
fitting to correct his records to reflect he was issued an RE code 
of 3K (Secretarial Authority) and the associated narrative reason 
for separation and separation program designator (SPD) code as 
correcting the record in this manner will make him eligible to be 
considered for enlistment with a waiver, which will require that 
MEPS make a determination as to his fitness for future service.  
Whether or not he is successful will depend entirely on the needs 
of the service, provided he is otherwise qualified, and our 
recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be allowed to 
return to the Air Force or any branch of the service.  Therefore, 
we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent 
indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was issued a 
narrative reason for separation of “Secretarial Authority,” a 
separation program designator (SPD) code of “KFF,” and a reentry 
code of “3K” in conjunction with his 19 May 2010 entry-level 
separation with uncharacterized service.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-01278 in Executive Session on 5 May 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit F.  Record of Proceedings, dated 14 Jan 14,
	            w/exhibits.
	Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Feb 14, w/atchs.

						
3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01278

    Original file (BC-2013-01278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code of 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. We also note the RE code the applicant received at separation was technically incorrect and his records will be administratively corrected to reflect the RE code 2C, which accurately reflects he received an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01278 was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00431

    Original file (BC-2006-00431.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 July 2002, the DVA denied his request for service-connection for recurrent anterior instability, left shoulder, because the disability pre- existed service and was not incurred in or aggravated by service. On 6 January 2004, the Board considered the applicant’s request that his RE code be changed. In view of the supporting statement from the applicant’s physician indicating his shoulder has healed and his medical condition changed, the Board changed his RE code to “3K” which can be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00823

    Original file (PD2012-00823.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On the MEB physical exam DD Form 2808, dated 05 November 2001, the examiner recorded “B shoulder subluxation, popping B shoulder, + sulcus sign L>R, N/V intact distally.” In the NARSUM, 4 months prior to separation, the examiner noted “he has minimal pain from this, but pretty much every time he tries to adduct, externally rotate the arms, he dislocates the shoulders. The examiner opined “Bilateral shoulder joint laxity, right greater than left, with history of recurrent, uncomplicated,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514

    Original file (BC-2011-02514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code “JDA,” “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and Re-entry (RE) code of “2C,” Approved Honorable...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02818

    Original file (PD-2013-02818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050310 The orthopedic MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination on 10 November 2004, reported continued right shoulder instability and subluxation with extension, abduction and overhead activity. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01052

    Original file (PD2011-01052.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Right Shoulder Condition . Since instability was the dominant disability and there was no compensable ROM limitation; application of 5202 by the Board is clearly indicated. Code 5202 provides ratings for “recurrent dislocation of the scapulohumeral joint”: a 30% (major) rating for “frequent episodes and guarding of all arm movements”; and, 20% for “infrequent episodes, and guarding of movement only at shoulder level.” Since the ratings are for ‘recurrent dislocation’, there is importance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02622

    Original file (BC-2011-02622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Block 28 – Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” to read “Erroneous Enlistment” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant’s eight-page statement is summarized as follows: 1) During the first meeting with her Air Force recruiter, the applicant disclosed her bee and penicillin allergies. Her recruiter instructed her that she did not need to disclose this information when she...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01790

    Original file (PD-2014-01790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orthopedic clinic note dated 12 February 2008 noted the CI reported recurrent episodes of subluxation. Full ROM of the right shoulder was recorded in May 2008 during separate PT and orthopedic clinic examinations. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02110

    Original file (BC-2005-02110.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02110 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JAN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from a “2C” to a “1C” and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Fraudulent” to “Erroneous” to allow him to reenlist in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00901

    Original file (PD2012 00901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although symptoms did improve with medication, a P3 profile due to “sleeping disorder” was recorded on 2 November 2002, limiting the CI to “no driving vehicles, handling ammunition, firing weapons or performing duties requiring concentration or alertness.” The commander’s performance statement letter, dated 14 March 2003,records that the limitation of duties for narcolepsy prohibits assignments in which “sudden incapacitation would be dangerous to self or others.” The narrative summary...